requestId:684c3e54765898.99937449.
From the history of history: Cui Ying’s modern literary style and “Ancient History Distinguishing Sports” Author: Li Changyan
Source: “Confucius Research” No. 4, 2021
Abstract: The rise and development of “Ancient History Distinguishing Sports” is complemented by Cui Ying’s modern literary style. Then, she looked down at the audience and saw several secrets. At the moment of movement, the reason why Jade Kan just dared to pretend that “Yu is an animal” based on the “Speaking Literature” led to a dramatic and sensible historical battle, which was undoubtedly directly triggered by Cui Xing’s statement that “Yu’s fundamental meaning is a name for a sect.” After that, the movement gradually moved to Confucius and academic research, and based on several research results of Cui Xing, Zhang Xitang and others further explored the original nature of Confucius, the original nature of “Queliang” and the year and month of the works of “Preface”. Finally, the reason why Jade Kan just published “Politics and History of the Five Demons” and “The Study of the Three Emperors” was undoubtedly caused by Cui Xing’s “Five Demons’s Sayings for Liu Xin” and “The Study of the Three Emperors”. Therefore, it can be said that Cui Yang’s modern literary saying is one of the main foreign country resources for the “ancient history discernment movement” to rise and develop.
Keywords: Cui Yang; Modern Literature; Ancient History of History; Chinese Modern Academic History;
Author Introduction: Li Changyan, male, born in 1986, from Ningzhong, a researcher at the joint construction and innovation of Confucian civilization in Shandong Province and the Ministry of Education. The purpose of the discussion is to the history of modern Chinese academic history.
Cui Yang was the palace army of the late Qing Dynasty’s literary school [1]. His works include “Exploring the Origin of Historical Records”, “Resume of Age”, “Signs of the Speak of the Speaks”, “Five Essences of the Five Essays”. Among them, “Exploring the Origin of Historical Records”, “Resume of the Years”, and “Section of the Discussions” all “extend” Kang Youwei’s “New Study of Learning”, and “more and more intimate” [2]; “Five Essays” importantly opposed Kang Youwei’s “Confucius’s Six Words” and advocated “Confucius’s “Five Essays” [3]. In short, after Conkang Youfu, Cui Ying further promoted the development of modern literary studies in the late Qing Dynasty.
Cui Xingheng is still one of the pioneers in the “Ancient History Distinguishing Technique”. The person involved, Money Xuantong, was immediately emphasized that the “Liu Xin’s ancient Chinese saying” he advocated was guided and initiated by Cui Xing彩官网彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩 In fact, I just said that my “Politics and History of the Five Virtues” was based on Cui Ying’s “Discovering the Origin of Historical Records” [5]. Cultivate contract After that,The researcher will search according to the picture, or test Cui Xing’s influence on Xuantong’s academic thinking [6], or analyze the academic relationship between Guijian and Cui Xing’s [7]. But in fact, the academic connection between Cui Xingsheng and the “Ancient History Distinguishing” school is not limited to this. Several modern literary words he proposed can be said to be fundamentally separated from the academic process of “Ancient History Distinguishing Sports”. Therefore, this article conducts a more profound systematic exploration of this problem based on the research of later generations, and then explores the academic source of “ancient history discernment movement” to remind the influence of modern literature in the late Qing Dynasty on modern academic studies.
1. Cui Ying’s “Exploring the Origin of Historical Records” is closely related to the “Ancient History Distinguishing Movement”
The “Ancient History Distinguishing Movement” is closely related to the problem of “Yu’s Source”. This problem originated from the “Teacher of Ancient History with Mr. Xuan of Master Xuan”. In this article, Jian Jian pointed out that ancient Chinese history was formed in a intensive manner. The ancient person in the minds of the people of the Zhou Dynasty was Yu, and Shun was not there until Confucius. As for where Yu came from, Gu Jian just thought that “it came from the Nine Cauldrons.” “Yu, “Yu Wen” says, “The skeleton is from the skeleton, pictographic shape”. “Yu Wen” says, “The skeleton is trampled by the earth.” With the skeleton and feet trampled by the earth, it is almost a kind of lizard.” Therefore, “Yu was an animal on the nine tripods. At that time, the tripod was like an object, and there must be many strange shapes. Yu was the most powerless animal on the tripod; or perhaps it was like a soil, so even if he was a person who opened the world.” [8] After this article was published, a dramatic battle of ancient history opened the curtain in the humanities circle at that time. Baozhuang
Among them, “Yu’s source” is one of the focus of this ancient historical battle. In “Answer the Book of Teachers and Teachers of Guardians”, Xuantong said that he had always believed that Shun must be “no man” or “the teacher of Teachers and Teachers of Guyou”. Because “六 is high; Shun is borrowed as ‘jun’”, the two “just are just the name of fantasy personality.” However, for Jade Jade’s opinion that Yu was “mostly a lizard” based on the “Speaking” and “Speaking” was unsuccessful [9]. In addition, Hu Xingxiu believed in the letter to Guan Jian, that “Nine Tributes” is a myth [10]. At the same time, Liu Xuli, Hu Jinren, Liu Fengzheng and others in the campaign even criticized and ridiculed this statement [11]. Facing the doubts of the public, Guardian just accepted the views of Xuantong and Hu Xingsheng on the one hand and took the initiative to abandon Yu’s words of “out of the Nine Tripods” [12], but on the other hand, he believed that “Yu was an animal” [13].
A step here is to point out that regardless of whether this is correct or not, this statement directly triggered the ancient history debate at that time, and promoted the “Ancient History Distinguishing Movement”. As congratulated by Yang Xi, after the publication of the “Teacher of Teacher Xuan of Ancient History with Master Xuan” was published, “it was extremely moving to the academic world at that time.” “Many people couldn’t help but see such a discussion,Especially, ‘Big Yu is a snail’ has become a snail’, which has been spread in society, destroying the intersection of knowledge for a while. At that time, some scholars believe that “Yu is a snail” is a profound and profound “supposition” [15].
The question of ours is, how did Jade think of “Yu is an animal” because of “Speaking”? Why did Money Xuantong explain the original meaning of Shun and Shun based on “Speech”? Some scholars believe that the view of the two directly originated from the “Shun and Yu Yu’s Destruction” by the japan (Japanese) scholar Bai Feng Kuji. In 1909, Bai Feng Kuji proposed in “Research on Ancient Chinese Tales”: “The master is responsible for the affairs of heaven, and the person in charge of human affairs is Shun”, and “Yu’s affairs are related to the earthly plaque”, this Long-term cultivation is the specific manifestation of “the thinking of the three talents of Liuhe people”. “The study of literature” can provide information to establish this discussion. According to the “Shiwen”, the meaning of “The Legend of the Constitution” is “high”; “Shun is a hibiscus plant”, “this has nothing to do with the name of Emperor Shun”; Yu is “the wormwood”, “this is not suitable for the name of the King of Xia” [16]. After this article was published, it was in the japan (Japanese) academic circle Baoqing.com ppt had a strong reaction. At this time, Xuantong was studying in Japan (Japan), and his “should” be clear about the situation in the academic world of japan (Japan). Since then, Jianjian was “complete and capable” and contacted Kuji’s view of Bai Bird Kuji while working in the Beida Library. Therefore, Xuantong and Kuji’s practice of using “Speaking” to explore Kuji, Shun and Yu’s general meaning were directly affected by Kuji’s directness by Bai Bird
發佈留言